3. Compare Scenarios
Last updated
Last updated
After constructing scenarios in the "Carbon Reduction Measures" tab, they can be compared in the "Scenario" tab. Typically, multiple strategies for reducing carbon emissions are under consideration in the early project phases. In EPIC, these strategies can be compared graphically and numerically.
Use the toggles on the left to add or remove scenarios from the figure. They will be plotted in the order in which they appear in the list.
This figure compares each active scenario to the base case across EPIC's 30 year time horizon.
Note that some parameters on the "reduction measures" tab can actually increase emissions, an effect that can lead to confusion in interpreting the Comparison Over Time figure. For instance, substituting the structural system can increase or decrease the embodied emissions depending on the nature of the change, or the addition of a PV array incurs embodied emissions even if it lower operational emissions over time. Accordingly, the patterns in this figure require interpretation based on the carbon reduction measures modeled for each scenario.
This figure compares the cumulative embodied, operational, and sequestered carbon for each scenario at 30 years after project completion:
Embodied carbon emissions. Cumulative emissions associated with building materials, their replacements, and with landscape maintenance.
Operational carbon emissions. Cumulative emissions associated with energy use from electricity and onsite fossil fuel use.
Sequestered and avoided emissions. Sequestered emissions from building structure and landscape planting. Avoided emissions from onsite energy generation in excess of use.
In addition to comparing magnitude of emissions after 30 years, this chart is useful for comparing the proportion of operational to embodied emissions between scenarios. In comparing these proportions, however, please note that the 30 year time horizon of EPIC. Operational emissions accrue over time, so the proportion of embodied to operational emissions is highly sensitive to the study's time horizon. The time horizon in EPIC is shorter than those most often used in wbLCA in order to support project teams in meeting time-based climate targets.
